People are being prepared for what is coming: a new society. There is talk about a new world order. Does this mean that the order in which power is distributed throughout society will be changed? Does it mean that people who currently have no say in world matters will be given that power? What does ‘a new world order’ really mean? What’s new about it? All I see is that the people who have the power right now are working hard towards establishing this new world order. The same people who decide the rules right now are the ones who are going to deliver this new world order. I wonder how ‘new’ I am going to feel.

If we are looking for a new society, a new way of living together, then we should in the first place consider how the current society is structured, what the main features are, and only then can we look for alternatives. Real alternatives.

A society is defined as the aggregate of people living together in a more or less ordered community. Basically, when people live together there must be rules that order the flow of life. The main purpose of these rules is twofold. First it minimises the number of clashes as people will know, in advance, how things are done within that society. And secondly it establishes an authority who sets out and controls the rules that each member of that society has to conform to. This means that the authority decides on the rules and all others must follow otherwise they will disrupt the basis on which the society has been built. So the authority decides what is ‘best’ and they have to convince everyone else that it will be best for everybody. Once this has been established, everybody has to work for this believed ‘common good’. This type of society establishes a division between its members and its authority, no matter who this authority is or how it came into power. The authority rules the society. How does it do this and how does it maintains its position of power?

Rules of conduct, of human behaviour, need to be put in place in all aspects of life. At all levels of human interaction rules are needed in order to avoid constant conflict situations, which will stop society from functioning. In effect, it will undermine, destabilise and finish the society. People will no longer be able to live together in an orderly manner. When there are no rules there is no way to predict the outcome of human interactions, which means that everything is possible. But if you don’t know what the result is going to be then you cannot use this result to do anything else with. You can’t build a usable house if you have no idea what any of the builders will do with the bricks. So how does the authority ensure the functionality of a society? By decreeing rules.

It sets up various systems of rules that cover all aspects of life. The aim is to prescribe how everybody should behave in all possible circumstances of life. It decides what is ‘good’ and what is ‘bad’ for everybody. Let’s take a look at these systems.

• Media – They need a way to convey their decisions of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ to the members of the society. They not only need to let them know what they have decided but they also need to convince them that it is the right decision, the right way to organise things. So they need to advertise their point of view, repeat it over and over again until it becomes ‘the norm’. Acceptance of rules made by an authority is crucial in the functioning of a society.
• Education – Convincing the population, and keeping them convinced, becomes a lot easier if you let them grow up with the ideas you use in order to control the society. So the authority organises a compulsory educational system for all children to plant their decision of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ in the very young. They will grow up not even realising that there might be other ways of looking at life, other evaluations of ‘good’ and ‘bad’.
• Judiciary – The authority sets up a system that oversees the behaviour of the members of society and punishes the failures to comply with their rules. It helps to force the population into compliance by setting examples for what the fate is for those who are being judged, by that authority, not to behave according to the rules of that authority. The result is that, for an easy life, the members ‘do as they are told’.
• Working Systems – In order to ensure that the common good, as defined by the authority, is being achieved the authority sets up various systems in which members of the society are obliged to work.
  • Industry: produces common goods
  • University: produces common thoughts
  • Religion: produces common beliefs
  • Healthcare System: produces common (public) health
• Confusion and Division – The authority needs to divide the population into smaller groups with different aims and different operational requirements. This allows them to convey a different understanding of ‘the common good’ to each of these groups. They will now all focus and work in different, and in many circumstances even opposing, manners ‘to achieve’ the common goal. Examples of this we see in the need to produce more and more electricity, while at the same time we shouldn’t pollute nature or use the natural resources that are available to us. A prime example of this is the conviction that nuclear power is a clean energy while in fact its waste products destroy life for many thousands of years. We see it in the rule that allows personal freedom, personal privacy, personal opinion, while at the same time one is not to do or say, or even think, anything that anybody who strictly obeys the authority rules may find offensive.

You may get the impression that a society, and establishing a society, is a very complex structure. Making such a society function properly is equally complex as every individual and every circumstance and every moment in time may require a different approach. Obviously a society where an authority decides what is ‘right’ and what is ‘wrong’ cannot provide rules of conduct for each situation an individual may find himself in. On top of that, life changes all the time too. Things don’t remain the same and what seemed reasonable yesterday may no longer be appropriate today. For this reason the authority keeps changing the goal posts. So you can imagine what a challenge it is for any authority to keep convincing the population they are making the right decisions when they constantly keep changing their decisions.

In order to remedy this problem the authority devises a system whereby it appears as if members of the population themselves make the decisions. Hence there will always be somebody from within the population to blame for failings and mishaps of the system of society itself. Once the authority has educated the population in their way of thinking they can ‘hand over’ the wheel to some individuals of the best educated, the best trained, amongst the elite. On the whole they will execute exactly what they have come to know as the common good. When the authority wants to change direction or finds that another individual becomes more suited to the task in hand they simply create a scandal or a disaster of some sort to shift the balance and to shift public opinion away from how it was to what they now want it to be. And because the authority has divided society into various different groups they can easily upset the balance between those groups by making slight alterations through the focus of the media, through allowing complaints and dissatisfaction within certain groups to surface, through creating new rules and new laws.

To the authority, it is not only very important that the population believes it runs itself, that it has the freedom to establish its own rules, but also that individuals are only aware of restrictions put upon them by their fellow citizens, not by the authority. It ensures that all fighting that erupts will be conducted between individuals within a group of society and between various groups of that society. Blaming each other of any inconvenience caused will keep the authority out of sight. As long as people blame the pharmaceutical industry for problems in the healthcare system the people who organise and run the industry, the people who hold the power over society, remain untouched, unblemished. As long as people blame the drug cartels for ruining people’s lives the people who create the mental desert that humans live in, which leads to people looking to escape their reality, remain untouched, unblemished. And to ensure that the society that has been created with all its divisions and various differing groups does not break up into those various fractions, the authority uses the following message constantly and in all places and circumstances: We’re in this together. Together we can overcome this problem. Apparently we can only find real solutions to the problems of society if we all stick together. And the only way we can do that, the only way we know how to do that, is by complying with the rules of the authority.

Let’s state these points very clearly.

• You live in a free country when you follow the rules of that country. You are not allowed to choose your country. The country owns you.
• You are free to make your own decisions if you follow the rules of the authority.
• As a human you have been given rights by an authority. These rights are removed when the authority deems it necessary.
• The authority decides what is the common good. Interfering with this idea of the common good will result in punishment.
• The authority takes care of all basic needs of your personal individual life.
  • Food industry
  • Power industry (gas – oil – electricity – alternative sources)
  • Health industry (pharma – research laboratories – technology – care centres – universities – birth control – death control)
  • Conflict industry (army – war industry – technology – propaganda – secrecy)
  • Conflict resolution (police – court – laws – re-education programmes)
  • Economy: all work for the authority (taxes) who promises to take care of each individual for all his needs (work – free time – entertainment)
  • Education: the authority provides ‘appropriate’ education for all (schooling – skills training – retraining courses)

What conclusions can we draw from this analysis?

• You are free to choose from the specific possibilities the authority allows you to choose from – Choosing is obligatory.
• The only right you truly possess is the right to serve the authority.
• The authority decides what is good for everyone, what is best for everyone and when to change it.
• The authority removes all individual knowledge and skills and replaces it with knowledge and skills the society requires – It is not allowed to be an individual except in the entertainment industry where non-conformism and extremism is being encouraged and glorified. This forms the seed to confuse individuals within the society as to what is acceptable and what is not.
• To remain in power the authority must divide the population as much as possible, keep the population confused and get them to organise themselves into groups around single issues. Such groups will consist of people from all walks of life who have no life in common. Disagreements on these single issues between members of the society will lead to arguments between themselves. It will divide the population and will require an expert, the authority, intervention.
• The authority has to ensure that they are in charge of all those groups (appoint experts – form investigative committees).
• The authority has to control the information stream (media – news – internet).
• The authority needs to know what is brewing within the population in order to pre-empt possible problems for the authority (data collection about income, spending, job, hobbies, travel, what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, whom you communicate with).

It must be obvious now that setting up a society and running one is very complex. Imagine the largest corporation you know and the complexity of a society is at least tenfold. You can only successfully run a society when you are able to control all aspects of that company. You need to know everything. You need to control everything. You need to have a solution for everything. You need to ensure that your personnel is not wise enough to know how you run the company, that they have no power to intervene, that you are able to make them comply at all times and under all circumstances and that they cannot leave the company.

I am sure that, if you think about it for a while, you can come up with some names for such a construction other than a company or a corporation. But there is still a little more to consider.

We have the impression that there are many different forms of society on the planet, based on differences in culture and political systems. However, they all exist on the same basis. There is a ruling faction and there are subjects. There are many rules, decreed by the authority, for people to follow. There is punishment in failing to do so. The same structural systems can be found in all those examples of a society. The purpose of those systems is the same in every one of those societies. And more recently we have noticed that they all use the same language to express the same goals, using the same methods to achieve those goals. And that I find strange.

People are different. They are different as individuals but they are also different in culture. Traditional cultures arose from the different conditions people live in. The climate, the richness of the land, access to water and food, and the fact that groups of people have lived separated from each other for a long time in history, which means that they all have evolved differently, finding different solutions to similar problems. However, today all nations are built in the same way on the values of economy, trade, education, finances, policing, and they declare the same solutions to internal problems each of those so-called different societies may be facing. It very much appears as if all societies we identify in the world are all part of one bigger society.

Everything that seems to matter nowadays is international and global, stretching far beyond any national borders and disregarding the various cultures. And this is well organised too. There are organisations, in effect systems of a society, that formulate and enforce rules that nations are obliged to, in many cases gladly offering to, adhere to. The national authorities have been enticed in the belief that there is great benefit in a globalisation of society. They have been well trained to be leaders and to execute what they have learned. There are global organisations for all the major systems of a society as we discussed before.

• Animals – the World Wildlife Fund, the International Fund for Animal Welfare …
• Children – UNICEF, Global Fund for Children, Save the Children International …
• Economy – World Economic Forum, World Trade Organisation, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development …
• Banking – World Bank, International Monetary Fund, Bank for International Settlements, the International Finance Corporation …
• Health – World Health Organisation, Doctors Without Borders, Gavi the Vaccine Alliance …
• Education – ALPHA Education, Global Campaign for Education …
• Policing – Interpol, United Nations Police, United Nations Security Council, NATO, Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, International Court of Justice …
• Government – United Nations, European Union, World Trade Organisation, International Monetary Fund …
• Earth – Global Alliance on Health and Pollution, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Environmental Protection Agency …

Every single system that is required to run a society has a global equivalent. Now I hope you don’t believe that such massive organisations, with enormous logistical as well as funding problems having to coordinate and communicate the world all over, just happen to see the light of day by sheer chance. These organisations are planned, organised and financed by those who can and who know they will benefit enormously from their huge investment of time, energy and money. They need this next step in the development of society to ensure even greater influence on the activities and the lives of their subjects. They have created, step by step and with the approval of the population in the belief it is for their own good, all the systems that are required for a society governed on a global scale. They are not simply joining up all existing societies. They are transforming them into a, for them, more manageable structure, a more profitable structure. Less work, more control. Less diversity, more benefits.

So maybe the new world order is not a new, as in a different, order in the world but rather a new world put in an orderly fashion that is very different from what it used to be. A global society has never been done before. Throughout human history there has been attempts to rule the ‘known world’ by occupation and military force and although that is nowadays still a part of it, the main thrust of the endeavour goes beyond the need for physical occupation. The authority has occupied the minds of the people and fixed and regulated their ordinary lives in such a way they have no recourse against the systems that have been put in place for them and to which they gladly contributed, voted for and worked for. You simply don’t bite off the hand that feeds you!

It seems to me that the structure of society itself is responsible for the following observations.

• No authority has ever lasted. There has always been dissatisfaction amongst some parts of the population with the authority ruling them.
• We fight our enemies in order to create peace. War doesn’t turn enemies into friends.
• We fight for rights we want the authority to give us. In doing so we have already recognised the authority as our master. At any time the authority can take any given rights away, because we have given them that authority to do so.
• We fight for freedom. In doing so we create more division and conflict because we deny others the freedom to see things differently. All this results in more restrictions ‘to protect’ our freedom against the freedom of others.
• We fight diseases to become healthy. Treatments for diseases improve all the time, as the medical authorities claim, but the population becomes more ill decade after decade, less able to work, needing more and more, not less and less, treatment.
• We fight for the preservation of life. And yet we encourage abortions on the assumption that otherwise life wouldn’t be good.
• We fight for the preservation of life. And yet we encourage euthanasia on the assumption that human beings do not need certain experiences in life, even though it is only through experiencing that humanity will learn.
• We fight for truth. In doing so we have decided that certain messages, certain ideas, certain discoveries are not worthy to be heard and to be considered as possible truths. The authority has created experts who decide for us what is true.
• We fight to be self-sufficient. As a society we are told to become more self-sufficient, which means the individual needs to contribute to that process, ignoring his own need to sustain his own and his family’s life.

I would conclude from this that we are fighting our way to disaster. None of those goals can ever be achieved by waging war. And every authority ruling individuals, which per definition is an authoritarian regime, needs to and will empower itself, not the individual.

My goodness. Can there really be an alternative? First of all, what is an alternative? It is in fact ‘a choice limited to one of two or more possibilities, as of things, propositions, or courses of action, the selection of which precludes any other possibility’. The Britannica adds that alternative refers to ‘not usual or traditional’ and even ‘existing or functioning outside the established society’. So there is a recognition here that an alternative to the existing society does exist but that it is to be found outside the established society. Inside the authoritarian society we have a variety of choices in which way the authority is established (democracy, communism, fascism, etc.), but once there is an authority organising a society, the way it actually is being organised follows the same pattern, as described above.

So a real alternative to an authoritarian society should exist. If we don’t have an authority telling the individual what he can and cannot do then it must be the individual himself who decides all of that. Let’s explore that thought a little further.

What are we scrapping when there is no outside authority ruling the individual?

• No centralised government
• No judiciary
• No constitutional law
• No enforced group identity (nationality, religion, …)
• No formal education
• No large scale production
• No formal healthcare
• No monetary system
• No wide spread media

Basically, to be a real alternative nothing that gives power to an organisation over an individual should be part of the new alternative structure. Let’s look at what that should mean for the individual.

• Take full responsibility for own feelings, thoughts, words and deeds
• Resolve all conflicts he is embroiled in
• At any given moment in time able to decide freely (his education, what’s right and wrong, what to believe, how to respond to situations, what makes him ill, who he wants to share his life with, …)
• Decide freely to what group he wants to belong to and how long for
• Take care of his own health
• Take care of his own education and that of his children
• Donates his goods and services to others for free
• Receives goods and services from others for free
• No obligation to his environment other than his free choice engagement

Do you get the feeling that individuals, free from restraints, will pull in every direction possible? Indeed they would. That means that the world population is not united in anything. An authority-lead structured society has a well-defined form, restricted as it may be, and a functional format, equally very restrictive. However, it is recognisable and therefore an individual can adapt to it rather than having to figure it all out for himself. He doesn’t need to solve his problems or those of the group. Following orders awards one with an ease and a sense of security. It relieves one from being responsible for any outcome. Follow the protocol and you are in the clear, we will protect you. Not having instruction on what to do when, on what direction to take, will result in everyone making up their own mind at that time. This outcome is generally known as ‘chaos’.

It turns out that every form of society, every form of living together, including any possible alternative one, requires a structured format. How much hope do we have left to find an alternative to an authoritarian regime? How else can life be structured?

Life itself, however, does have a formal framework. Life occurs inside Nature, is a part of Nature. Every lifeform is limited in its structure by Nature itself, and within every species every individual is limited in its structure even further. Nature also determines the rules by which each species and each individual within that species conducts himself. They all follow the rules laid down by Nature. There is no escaping from this. There is no alternative to the way Nature has organised life, especially not within Nature itself, and life outside of Nature doesn’t exist on this planet. Equally, within our authoritarian society there is no real alternative possible within the structure of such a society. So what would happen if we replace a human authoritarian society by a Natural authoritarian society?

• The same rules of Nature apply to everybody – the Laws of Nature
• Every single lifeform has intrinsic power to keep itself alive for as long as possible
• Every species has intrinsic power to survive for as long as possible
• Everything has a specific purpose, happens for a reason, while nothing in itself can be determined to be ‘good’ or ‘bad’ – it is only energies interacting
• Every single specimen of every species has a life that contributes essential knowledge and experiences to the development of the species, which in turn contributes to the development of Nature as a whole
• Every single life is different from every other life and yet they are all equally important to the development of Nature
• Nature doesn’t have a written constitution. Life itself is an expression of the fundamental laws, the constitution, of Nature

A Nature-lead society requires a complete alternative knowledge in order to be able to organise a completely different structure and format in line with the Laws of Nature. In the first place it would be good if we could have some idea as to what Nature’s constitution entails. If you want to know you will have to study it. Where? In Nature. How? By not interfering with Nature one can learn what Nature does and how it does it.

There is some good news for the poor individual who wants to embark on this journey and at the same time will have to cope with all every day survival problems of life itself and to cope with the existing authoritarian regime that controls and limits his possibilities to do so. The main thing an individual needs to get to know is how life truly operates within his own living conditions, in a natural manner. An Eskimo doesn’t need to know what life is like on the equator. First we study those aspects of life that manifest in our own life. Later, if we are interested, we can study life itself as a whole so we become able to formulate more of those Natural Laws.

So, in your own life, you observe the effects of your feelings, thoughts, words and deeds on your immediate environment and on your inner peace. Know that your body is a physical manifestation of your inner emotional and psychological balance. Hence, everything your body expresses has a direct relationship with how your life has been built and how you experience its efficient or not so efficient functionality. It never lies. Your physical ease or unease in all living situations is an expression of your inner state at that time under those circumstances. It basically tells you how your personal human structure is responding to life as it is happening to you. Natural truth and honesty is expressed in your natural being, in your emotions, in your psychological state and in your body. You need to take full responsibility for the effects that your life has on its surroundings and on your inner life. You need to observe and learn what it is that creates specific conflicts and how you can rectify those, both conflicts within your inner Self as conflicts between your Self and your outer world. The individual is the only authority over that specific individual life.

• Takes authority over his own life
• Cannot have any authority over any other life
• Takes full responsibility for his own life
• Cannot make any claims on any other life or bear any direct responsibility for it

The individual forms the basic building block of the society, just as is the case for an authoritarian society. The difference is that this building block has all power instead of none. If we give it all the power to build an alternative society within the framework of Nature, following the Laws of Nature, then we need to take a good look at the kind of bricks we have to build the society structure with.

Every individual is allowed to, has to, be what he or she needs to be. And all these individuals are completely different in knowledge, skills, talents, awareness, and so many other aspects of life that they won’t fit together just like that. Together they are covering the entire spectrum of all possibilities of human beings and without a strictly organised structure in which they can function, can live together as one unit, is impossible. If we are going to try and form a society out of this heap of oddly shaped bricks and allow each brick to be what it needs to be then we, as architects, are not allowed to ask them to change shape or to become something else. How can a society emerge from this chaos? And in this case, who is actually building the society, who is the architect, as it can’t be humans because they are not allowed to control other individuals if we are truly looking for an alternative society? In fact, it is Nature that forms this society.

Within the entire spectrum of humanity there are similarities between people that may bring them – not all of them – together. It may be that a number of people have knowledge of a certain way of life, be it mountain life or seaside life or jungle life. It may be that they have a similar vision of what a good life would look like or maybe they agree on what they definitely want to avoid in their basic everyday life. Maybe they agree on how to achieve a simple, undisturbed, peaceful life where their children are safe, where they can learn all they need in order to survive, to have a good future, and where they can be themselves. People that have similar visions on the basic structure of life may decide that together they have more chance of creating the good life for themselves and for their children. They voluntarily may decide to form a group, living as a community, joined together by similar values, hopes and expectations. Such a group decides over all aspects of life, including internal conflicts. The group takes a course determined by the group, where each member of the group needs to be heard. Every individual of such a group remains a free person. And yes, there will be ‘a common good’ for the group, which is decided upon by the group. However, the group will have to provide ways for every member of that group to be able to live with the common good that has been decided upon. And maybe, at times, some individuals can no longer identify with the common ground the group is built upon, but as free individuals they have a free choice to leave. They go in peace and find another group where the basic glue that holds the group together suits that individual better. He can go without owing the community he leaves anything and equally without the community owing him anything. “It was good while it lasted and now it is time to say goodbye.”

Groups are spontaneously formed living communities where people join their knowledge, skills and talents to benefit themselves and the others. Every contribution is free but cannot be demanded by the group. What the group is willing to offer the individuals within the group is a free choice too and needs to be decided locally on the basis of what is available. It must be clear that across the entire planet there will be many thousands, even millions, of different groups. They all have different priorities in life, different ways of doing things, different convictions, different resources, and so on. No group is to interfere in any way in any other group. Each is allowed to make their own decisions, determine their own destiny, and if people within the group want the group to make major changes then it is up to the individuals within that specific group to achieve those changes, together.

In this way we can organise a global society too. It is made up of an enormous number of different free groups who only occupy themselves with themselves and who don’t interfere in any other group. All individuals recognise the fact that Nature is the ruling body, that Nature is the true source of life and provides us all with the same guidebook. All individuals know that they are all following the same ‘instructions’ based on the Laws of Nature, even though they all may be living a different truth, a different reality. That is because the entire spectrum of possible expressions of the way Nature functions is far greater than can be incorporated in one single life or in the life of one group. So what is true for one group is not necessarily true for another and that is the main reason why individuals shouldn’t interfere in another individual life and one group shouldn’t interfere in another group either. The group takes responsibility for its own group and nothing more, just as each individual takes responsibility for his own life. Within each of these groups a great number of very different free individuals live together. Each of those individuals takes full responsibility for his or her own life and does not exert any power in the life of another individual.

Groups interact with each other in a free manner, respecting each other’s uniqueness. They can exchange goods and services if they want to and on a free basis. Everything that is given to another group should be given freely. Everything that is being received by a group is received without being, in any way shape or form, indebted to the donor. The value of goods and services is determined by both parties involved and only lasts for that particular moment. Just as between individuals gifts are free and cannot ever be demanded from an individual. The gifts from one group to another are equally free from any form of debt or retribution and can under no circumstances be demanded. The individual only has responsibilities towards his own life and the group only has responsibilities towards the members of that group.

This alternative society, just like all others, begins with the individual. It is a society not build on the rights of an individual, apart from the right to be yourself, but on your duties as set out by Nature itself. The individual has to change his mind on what he or she accepts as the authority. Instead of accepting that another human tells you what to do, when to do it and how to do it, you trust Nature to be your guide in life.

After changing your mind you begin to take more and more responsibility for all your feelings, thoughts, words and deeds and you start to withdraw, bit by bit, from any structure that the existing society is putting upon your life. You free yourself from the burden of society as and when you can. Each person decides this for himself.

You begin to live your own life. You decide who you would want to ‘work’ with. Together, following Nature’s way, you help each other, support each other and both your lives will be enriched by the free, non-coerced, co-operation. This way you allow the group to expand in numbers.

The focus of life is survival, which means you surviving in your immediate environment. You have a direct relationship with your immediate surroundings and you take note of the effect your life has on your environment. You balance your needs with the requirements of your environment, but always deciding yourself what you consider to be best at that time. You also live with the consequences of those decisions. This means that any conflict that may arise from your decision has to be dealt with by yourself in co-operation with your immediate environment.

The same principles go for the group. Individuals who decide to live together in order to survive must take note of the effects they have on their surroundings and deal with the consequences. Always remember that each individual, and each group, has the same right to survival as you have. Every decision is made at a particular moment and has no bearing on any other moment in the future. Circumstances change and so your decisions may change, and very often should change, too. Any interchange between groups happen on a free basis and are only binding at that moment, for those circumstances.

The global society will then be a Nature driven society whereby all groups of humans living together, thereby forming a society in their own right, are guided by the Laws of Nature. No human has the right or the knowledge to sit in judgement over any other group or individual. It only takes care of its own needs and only protects those. Each group operates in the same way with regards to the individuals who are members of that society. You protect your way of living, which means that a group may decide it no longer wants to co-operate with a specific individual but the group has no right to deny that individual his or her personal choices. It can only decide that this is not the right place for that individual to manifest those choices. The individual is free to leave and should receive the help from the group in doing so. Whatever is given by an individual to the group is free and holds no obligation with regards to a compensation. Whatever is given by the group to the individual is free and holds no obligation with regards to a compensation.

Every layer of society, from individual to the world order, is based on the same laws, the Laws of Nature. It is obvious now that studying and knowing those laws is an absolute requirement if a truly alternative society will ever emerge in human history. Or I can put it differently. You will never live in a truly alternative society unless you study, know and live by the Laws of Nature.

An individual determines his own rules of life. He needs to find a harmony between the execution of those rules and his immediate surroundings.

Individuals who determine they are going to live together, as a group, following the same rules need to find a harmony between the way they live and their immediate surroundings.

This way the entire globe will be covered by groups of people who live in harmony with the groups they are surrounded by, even though the way of life of all these groups vary enormously. There will be no need to be envious for any individual as he has the freedom to find the group that suits his way of life the best. There will be no need to be afraid as each group will have what they need and do not require to capture anything from anybody else.

A new society starts with one individual who, by example, leads others to Nature’s way.

BACK TO TUTORIALS